From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plaintiff v. Gogineni

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 28, 2013
2:11-cv-3438 JAM DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2013)

Opinion

          ERIC GRAVES, (SBN 179253), JEFF STONE, (SBN 155190), KIMBERLEE TSAI, (SBN 227426), STONE & GRAVES, Gold River, CA, Attorneys for Defendant, RAMA GOGINENI.

          KELLY CROWE, Pro Se Plaintiff.


          STIPULATION TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff KELLY CROWE ("Plaintiff"), pro se, and Defendant RAMA GOGINENI ("Defendant"), by and through his attorneys of record, that Defendant may file an Amended Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant's Amended Answer shall be filed no later than July 3, 2013.

         IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that this stipulation does not impair Plaintiff's right to file, or the deadlines relating to filing, a motion to strike Defendant's Amended Answer should Plaintiff deem such a motion to be appropriate.

         IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike currently on file and set to be heard by this Court on July 19, 2013, is hereby dropped as moot by virtue of this STIPULATION.

          ORDER

         GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, AND THE PARTIES HAVING STIPULATED TO THE SAME, this Court finds that the above-stated STIPULATION is sanctioned by the Court and shall be and now is the Order of the Court. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Rama Gogineni may file an Amended Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant's Amended Answer shall be filed no later than July 3, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this STIPULATION does not impair Plaintiff's right to file, or the deadlines relating to filing, a motion to strike Defendant's Amended Answer should Plaintiff deem such a motion to be appropriate. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike set to be heard by this Court on July 19, 2013, (Doc. No. 83) is dropped from the Court's calendar and is denied without prejudice as having been rendered moot by virtue of the parties' STIPULATION.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Plaintiff v. Gogineni

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 28, 2013
2:11-cv-3438 JAM DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Plaintiff v. Gogineni

Case Details

Full title:KELLY CROWE Plaintiff, v. RAMA GOGINENI, an individual; BULLIVANT HOUSER…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 28, 2013

Citations

2:11-cv-3438 JAM DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2013)