From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitts v. Pitts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 2003
305 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-04415

Submitted April 21, 2003.

May 5, 2003.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated November 2, 2000, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Montagnino, R.), entered March 28, 2002 as, upon reargument, adhered to so much of its original determination in an order of the same court, dated December 17, 2001, as denied his motion for an award of an attorney's fee.

Bodnar Milone, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Erik Kristensen and Peter O. Bodnar of counsel), for appellant.

Hall Dickler Kent Goldstein Wood, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Samuel S. Yasgur of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The issue of the apportionment of an attorney's fee is controlled by the circumstances and equities of each particular case (see Grossman v. Grossman, 260 A.D.2d 602), and the trial court is in the best position to assess these factors (see Matter of Braham v. Braham, 264 A.D.2d 418). Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to award the defendant an attorney's fee.

S. MILLER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pitts v. Pitts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 2003
305 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Pitts v. Pitts

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET W. PITTS, respondent, v. TILGHMAN G. PITTS III, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 528

Citing Cases

Alvarado v. Alvarado

The apportionment of an attorney's fee is controlled by the circumstances of each particular case and the…

Alvarado v. Alvarado

The apportionment of an attorney's fee is controlled by the circumstances of each particular case and the…