From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pittman v. Wells Fargo

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 20, 2024
23-cv-03699-JSW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-03699-JSW

06-20-2024

RANDY D. PITTMAN, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO N.A., et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JEFFREY S. WHITE, United States District Judge.

On January 29, 2024, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's civil rights complaint for failure to present a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff was granted 28 days to file an amended complaint, and warned that if he did not do so the case would be dismissed. He has not filed an amended complaint, requested an extension of time, or shown cause why not. This case is accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice. See WMX Technologies v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (when complaint has been dismissed with leave to amend and plaintiff does not amend, further district court determination is necessary).

The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pittman v. Wells Fargo

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 20, 2024
23-cv-03699-JSW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Pittman v. Wells Fargo

Case Details

Full title:RANDY D. PITTMAN, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO N.A., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 20, 2024

Citations

23-cv-03699-JSW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2024)