Opinion
6:22-cv-06049
07-05-2022
ROBERT EARL PITTMAN PLAINTIFF v. JOHN THURSTON, Arkansas Secretary of State; DEXTER PAYNE, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction; DR. THOMAS DANIELS, WellPath; BERNARD WILLIAMS; MAJOR JIMMY COLEMAN; and MICHAEL THOMAS DEFENDANTS
ORDER
ROBERT T. DAWSON SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 22, 2022, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 7). Plaintiff proceeds in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pro se and in forma pauperis. Judge Bryant recommended that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 6) be dismissed without prejudice because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
On July 1, 2022, Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 8). Upon review, Plaintiff's objections are not directly responsive to the Report and Recommendation and offer no error of law or fact from which the Court finds it necessary to depart from the Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Further, the report is without clear error and should be and hereby is adopted in toto. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 6) should be and hereby is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED