From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pittman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 9, 1999
733 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-891

Opinion filed June 9, 1999.

An Appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Barbara S. Levenson, Judge, L.T. No. 95-35970.

Michael Pittman, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.


Of the issues raised by the defendant in this appeal we agree with the State that there is merit only in one. Defendant argues that his ten (10) year sentence on the charge of possession of cocaine is illegal because "Section 775.084(1)(a)3, Florida Statutes (1995), does not permit enhanced sentencing as a habitual offender if the felony is `a violation of Section 893.13 relating to the purchase or possession of a controlled substance.'" Barber v. State, 699 So.2d 325, 325-26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Accordingly, we reverse the defendant's habitual offender sentence for the charge of possession of cocaine and remand with instructions to vacate that sentence and re-sentence the defendant on that count.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Pittman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 9, 1999
733 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Pittman v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL PITTMAN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 9, 1999

Citations

733 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Owens v. State

Section 775.084(1)(a)3, Florida Statutes (1997), specifically exempts those convicted of "purchase or…

Owens v. State

The state correctly concedes that the trial court erred and asks this court to reverse and remand for…