In Pittman, the Supreme Court found that the district court abused its discretion in failing to vacate the property settlement agreement where the wife had obtained an unconscionable advantage due to the husband's ignorance.
Summary of this case from Robbins v. RobbinsJune 20, 1947.
Affirmed.
In Pittman, the Supreme Court found that the district court abused its discretion in failing to vacate the property settlement agreement where the wife had obtained an unconscionable advantage due to the husband's ignorance.
Summary of this case from Robbins v. RobbinsFull title:JEWEL ARLENE PITTMAN v. ROBERT J. PITTMAN
Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A
Date published: Jun 20, 1947
2 C. Lyons, Jr., Alabama Practice 481 (1973). Separation agreements or agreements made in contemplation of…
Vernon v. VernonAs Joseph notes, the Nebraska Supreme Court has recognized that consent decrees "'will be respected by the…