Pitt v. Mason

Full title: DAVID PITT, Petitioner, v. BERNADETTE MASON, et al., Respondents.

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 16, 2022

2:21-cv-0834 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0834

06-16-2022

DAVID PITT, Petitioner, v. BERNADETTE MASON, et al., Respondents.

JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 16^th day of June, 2022, after de novo review of Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 2; and upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, ECF No. 10, and Petitioner's objections to the R&R, ECF No. 13, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 10, is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The objections, ECF No. 13, to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED;¹

1 This Court is “not required to make any separate findings or conclusions when reviewing a Magistrate Judge's recommendation de novo under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).” Hill v. Barnacle, 655 Fed.Appx. 142, 147 (3d Cir. 2016).

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 2, is DISMISSED with prejudice;

4. There is no basis to issue a certificate of appealability; and

5. The case is CLOSED.