From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitre v. Bac Home Loans Servicing LP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 21, 2011
No. CV 11-821-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Nov. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV 11-821-PHX-JAT

11-21-2011

Ray C. Pitre Plaintiff, v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Defendants.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by (1) Bank of America, N.A., as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Serving, LP, BANA CWB CIG 1st Liens, (2) MERSCORP, Inc., and (3) Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. Doc. 13. In response to this motion to dismiss, Plaintiff opposed dismissal, in the alternative asked for leave to amend the complaint, and asked for a 120 stay of the case to hire counsel. Doc. 15. Defendant then replied in support of its motion to dismiss and opposed any stay of the case. Thereafter, on September 19, 2011, Plaintiff filed a notice that he filed bankruptcy and suggested that this case be stayed. Doc. 18.

Defendant moved to dismiss Plaintiff's original complaint on June 27, 2011. In response to that motion, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint (Doc. 11). The currently pending motion to dismiss addresses the amended complaint.

The automatic stay of the bankruptcy code does not apply to plaintiffs. See Martin-Trigona v. Champion Federal Savings & Loan, 1988 WL 46596, *2 (N.D. Ill. 1988); In re Hill, 39 B.R. 894, 897 (Bkrtcy. Or., 1984). Accordingly this case is not stayed.

But the cause of action is the property of the estate. Turner v. Cooke, 362 F.3d 1219, 1225-26 (9th Cir. 2004); Cusano v. Klien, 264 F.3d 936, 945 (9th Cir. 2001).
--------

With respect to Plaintiff's request that this case be stayed for 120 days to allow Plaintiff to hire an attorney, while Plaintiff may hire counsel if he chooses, the Court will not stay a cause of action pending the hiring of counsel. Therefore, the request to stay the case is denied.

Based on the foregoing,

IT IS ORDERED that the suggestion of a stay based on filing bankruptcy (Doc. 18) is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to stay this case to hire counsel (Doc. 15) is also denied.

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Court deems the motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) to be fully briefed, and because no party requested oral argument, the motion is under advisement.

James A, Teilborg

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pitre v. Bac Home Loans Servicing LP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 21, 2011
No. CV 11-821-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Nov. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Pitre v. Bac Home Loans Servicing LP

Case Details

Full title:Ray C. Pitre Plaintiff, v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP; Mortgage…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Nov 21, 2011

Citations

No. CV 11-821-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Nov. 21, 2011)