From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitman v. Engstrom

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Dec 9, 2008
5:08CV00198 BSM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 9, 2008)

Opinion

5:08CV00198 BSM/HDY.

December 9, 2008


ORDER


The court has reviewed the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young and plaintiff's objections. After carefully considering plaintiff's objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the court concludes that the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff Smith's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 32) is DENIED; and

2. Plaintiff's Smith's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. No. 31) and Motion for an Emergency Appointment of a Mental Heath Expert (Doc. No. 33) are DENIED.

3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Pitman v. Engstrom

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Dec 9, 2008
5:08CV00198 BSM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 9, 2008)
Case details for

Pitman v. Engstrom

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS PITMAN ADC # 119869 PLAINTIFF v. EDWARD ENGSTROM, Doctor, Maximum…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Dec 9, 2008

Citations

5:08CV00198 BSM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 9, 2008)