From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitlor v. T.D. Ameritrade

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jan 28, 2019
No. 18-2067 (8th Cir. Jan. 28, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-2067

01-28-2019

David Pitlor Plaintiff - Appellant v. T.D. Ameritrade; Kutak Rock LLP Defendants - Appellees


Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha [Unpublished] Before LOKEN, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

David Pitlor appeals after the district court dismissed his action alleging federal and state law claims related to his online trading account. Upon careful review of the district court record and the parties' arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversing the dismissal. See Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (grant of motion to dismiss for failure to state claim under Rule 12(b)(6) is reviewed de novo). We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Pitlor's post-judgment motion. Miller v. Baker Implement Co., 439 F.3d 407, 414 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable John M. Gerrard, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. --------


Summaries of

Pitlor v. T.D. Ameritrade

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jan 28, 2019
No. 18-2067 (8th Cir. Jan. 28, 2019)
Case details for

Pitlor v. T.D. Ameritrade

Case Details

Full title:David Pitlor Plaintiff - Appellant v. T.D. Ameritrade; Kutak Rock LLP…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jan 28, 2019

Citations

No. 18-2067 (8th Cir. Jan. 28, 2019)

Citing Cases

Pitlor v. TD Ameritrade, Inc.

SeePitlor v. TD Ameritrade, No. 8:17-CV-359, 2018 WL 3997118 (D. Neb. Apr. 19, 2018), aff'd sub nom. Pitlor…