From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pippin v. Allgood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 26, 2012
No. 3:11-cv-00915 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 26, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:11-cv-00915

11-26-2012

ERIC S. PIPPIN, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER ALLGOOD, et al., Defendants.


Chief Judge Haynes


ORDER

In accordance with the Memorandum filed herewith, Defendant's motion for summary judgement (Docket Entry No. 80) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute.

This is the Final Order in this action. Any appeal of this order would not be in good faith as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

It is so ORDERED.

________________________

WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR.

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Pippin v. Allgood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 26, 2012
No. 3:11-cv-00915 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Pippin v. Allgood

Case Details

Full title:ERIC S. PIPPIN, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER ALLGOOD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 26, 2012

Citations

No. 3:11-cv-00915 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 26, 2012)