From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pipkin v. Green

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1892
14 S.E. 966 (N.C. 1892)

Opinion

(February Term, 1892)

MOTION of appellee to dismiss.

E. C. Smith for appellee.

No counsel contra.


This case was tried at November Term, 1890. It should have stood for argument here at Spring Term, 1891. In August, 1891, the appellant agreed to take no advantage of appellee's delay till then to serve a countercase. But this did not release appellant from the duty of docketing case here at Fall Term, 1891. The case, however, was not docketed till February Term, 1892; nor is it printed. The motion to dismiss should be allowed. In re Berry, 107 N.C. 326; Hinton v. Pritchard, 108 N.C. 412; Johnston v. Whitehead, 109 N.C. 207.

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: S.C., 112 N.C. 355.

(463)


Summaries of

Pipkin v. Green

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1892
14 S.E. 966 (N.C. 1892)
Case details for

Pipkin v. Green

Case Details

Full title:E. J. PIPKIN, GUARDIAN, v. J. A. GREEN, SHERIFF OF HARNETT COUNTY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1892

Citations

14 S.E. 966 (N.C. 1892)
110 N.C. 462

Citing Cases

Pipkin v. Green

CLARK, J. This is a motion made at September Term, 1892, to reinstate the appeal which had been dismissed at…

Johnston v. Whitehead

Motion denied. Cited: Pipkin v. Green, 110 N.C. 462; Calvert v. Carstarphen, 133 N.C. 26; Howard v. Speight,…