holding that under broad arbitration clause, whether a party could impose unilateral time limits for the selection of arbitrators was a question for arbitrator, not court, to decide
Summary of this case from United States ex rel. W. Bldg. Grp., LLC v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am.No. 91-6100.
May 12, 1992.
W.D.Okl.
AFFIRMED
holding that under broad arbitration clause, whether a party could impose unilateral time limits for the selection of arbitrators was a question for arbitrator, not court, to decide
Summary of this case from United States ex rel. W. Bldg. Grp., LLC v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am.using deliberate indifference test for medical care for the civilly committed without mentioning Youngberg
Summary of this case from Battista v. Clarkeapplying the deliberate indifference standard to a voluntarily committed individual's claim
Summary of this case from Jordan v. Dist. of ColumbiaFull title:Pipkin v. City of Moore, Okl
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: May 12, 1992
The Court has broad discretion to dismiss or convert a case. In re Preferred Door Co., 990 F.2d 547, 549…
United States ex rel. W. Bldg. Grp., LLC v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am." Thus, although plaintiff may well be correct that under Fanderlik-Locke the arbitration of plaintiff's…