From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piper v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 7, 2008
Civil No. 06-3802 (PAM/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 7, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-3802 (PAM/RLE).

August 7, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson dated July 15, 2008. The R R recommended that this Court grant Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and deny Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment.

The Government has declined to file objections to the R R. The Court therefore ADOPTS the R R (Docket No. 28).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 25) is DENIED;
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 18) is DENIED; and
3. This matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings in accordance with the R R, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Piper v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 7, 2008
Civil No. 06-3802 (PAM/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 7, 2008)
Case details for

Piper v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Piper, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 7, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 06-3802 (PAM/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 7, 2008)

Citing Cases

Beecher v. Astrue

Second, SSR 96-6p does not require the ALJ to obtain a new opinion from a state agency medical consultant…