From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pintado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 11, 2002
831 So. 2d 816 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 3D02-614.

Opinion filed December 11, 2002.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Manuel Crespo, Judge. L.T. Nos. 96-34777, 97-16612.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney General and Kristine Keaton and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GODERICH, JJ.


The defendant seeks review of the denial without hearing of a post conviction motion which sought additional credit for time served. Because of the uncertainty in the present record, particularly as to the reason for the defendant's confinement in Orange County during the period for which the claim is now made, we vacate the order below and remand for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Rule 3.850. Consult Tatum v. State, 811 So.2d 849 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (SC02-952, stayed pending review in Gethers v. State, SC01-2639).


Summaries of

Pintado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 11, 2002
831 So. 2d 816 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Pintado v. State

Case Details

Full title:JULIO CESAR PINTADO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 11, 2002

Citations

831 So. 2d 816 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)