From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinson v. Prieto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 1, 2013
Case No. ED CV 10-811-PSG (SP) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 10-811-PSG (SP)

02-01-2013

JEREMY PINSON, Plaintiff, v. PABLO PRIETO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, records on file, and the July 2, 2012 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which plaintiff objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: (1) the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant Bureau of Prisons is granted, defendant Bureau of Prisons is dismissed from this action, and plaintiff's requests for declaratory and injunctive relief are stricken from the First Amended Complaint; and (2) the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Robert McFadden and Joseph Norwood is denied. Defendants McFadden and Norwood are ordered to answer the First Amended Complaint within fourteen days of this Order.

________________________

HONORABLE PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pinson v. Prieto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 1, 2013
Case No. ED CV 10-811-PSG (SP) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Pinson v. Prieto

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY PINSON, Plaintiff, v. PABLO PRIETO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 1, 2013

Citations

Case No. ED CV 10-811-PSG (SP) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)

Citing Cases

Kandi v. Mgmt. & Training Corp.

E. Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ("RLUIPA")Although the provisions of RLUIPA, which…