From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinson v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jun 6, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-450 (W.D. La. Jun. 6, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-450

06-06-2015

JEREMY PINSON, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ET AL., Defendants.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Before the court is the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 8] of the Magistrate Judge, to which the plaintiff, Jeremy Pinson ("Pinson") has filed Objections [Doc. 9]. For the following reasons, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 9] is AFFIRMED.

FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Pinson is a former gang member who alleges that he is danger because gang members have been ordered to kill him. At the time he filed his complaint, Pinson was housed at ADX Florence in Florence, Colorado. The basis for his cause of action is that the Federal Correctional Institute in Oakdale, Louisiana, refused to accept his transfer from ADX Florence. Subsequent to filing suit, Pinson was transferred to the Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri. On February 23, 2015, the magistrate judge issued her Report and Recommendations and recommended that Pinson's Complaint be dismissed, with prejudice.

Prisoner Compl. [Doc. 1], at 4.

Id. at 2.

Id. at 4.

See Not. of Change of Address [Doc. 7].

Report and Recommendations [Doc. 8].

LAW & ANALYSIS

The court herein adopts the magistrate judge's conclusions of law with respect to Pinson's inability to bring a Bivens action against the Bureau of Prisons. Regarding the transfer request, an inmate has no constitutionally protected right to serve a sentence in any particular institution or to be transferred from one facility to another. Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 244-48 (1983). However, the state also has a responsibility under the Eighth Amendment to protect the safety of its prisoners. Streeter v. Hooper, 618 F.2d 1178, 1182 (5th Cir. 1980) (citations omitted). In circumstances where a prisoner's life is in danger, a district court has the ability to order that the prisoner is placed in another institution. Id. at 1182.

Report and Recommendations [Doc. 8], at 3.
--------

Pinson has been transferred from ADX Florence since the initiation of the present suit. Because he is no longer in imminent danger, there is no cause of action for transfer to a more preferable institution.

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 8] is AFFRIMED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDRED that all of Pinson's claims be and hereby are DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, as frivolous and for failure to state a claim in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii), and (iii).

Lake Charles, Louisiana, this 6 day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

PATRICIA MINALDI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pinson v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jun 6, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-450 (W.D. La. Jun. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Pinson v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY PINSON, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Jun 6, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-450 (W.D. La. Jun. 6, 2015)