From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinna v. Larys

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 2001
284 A.D.2d 315 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued May 4, 2001.

June 4, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated March 28, 2000, as granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants Yolanda Larys and Health Center Family Medical Office which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them to the extent that they are based upon incidents occurring on August 22, 1994, and November 14, 1994, and the defendant Yolanda Larys cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied those branches of her motion which were for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint insofar as asserted against her as was based on visits other than those of August 22, 1994, and November 14, 1994.

Sullivan Papain Block McGrath Cannavo, P.C., New York, N Y (Stephen C. Glasser and Albert B. Aquila of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Slevin, Sold, Neubardt, Weisman, Samberg, Faillace Mezzacappa, Mineola, N.Y. (Ellen F. Weisman of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P. SONDRA MILLER LEO F. McGINITY ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Partial summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant Yolanda Larys and her employer, the defendant Health Center Family Medical Office (hereinafter Health Center), with respect to the plaintiff's claims which are based upon her decedent's consultations with Dr. Larys on August 22, 1994, and November 14, 1994. The Statute of Limitations expired with respect to those claims before the commencement of the action, and the continuous treatment doctrine is inapplicable since the record shows that the treatment rendered to the plaintiff's decedent during those visits was unrelated to the condition or complaint which gave rise to this lawsuit (see, Nykorchuck v. Henriques, 78 N.Y.2d 255; Charalambakis v. City of New York, 46 N.Y.2d 785, 787; Davis v. City of New York, 38 N.Y.2d 257; Borgia v. City of New York, 12 N.Y.2d 151).

The balance of the motion of Dr. Larys was properly denied (see, Walker v. Mount Vernon Hosp., 272 A.D.2d 468).


Summaries of

Pinna v. Larys

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 2001
284 A.D.2d 315 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Pinna v. Larys

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA PINNA, ETC., APPELLANT-RESPONDENT, v. YOLANDA LARYS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 4, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 315 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
725 N.Y.S.2d 571

Citing Cases

Grey v. N.Y.C. Health and Hospitals Corp.

ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting the motion in its…

Catterson v. Suffolk

Although the Supreme Court providently granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a late notice of…