From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinkston v. Kelly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 9, 2014
CASE NO. 1:13CV2220 (N.D. Ohio May. 9, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:13CV2220

05-09-2014

IKE PINKSTON Petitioner, v. BENNIE KELLY, Respondent.


JUDGE DAN AARON POLSTER


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

AND ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp ("R & R") (Doc. # 7). The R&R recommends that Petitioner Ike Pinkston's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. # 1) be dismissed as time-barred. The deadline has long since passed for Petitioner to file written objections to the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure to file objections by the deadline constitutes a waiver of the right to obtain a de novo review of the R&R in the district court, United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949 (6th Cir. 1981), and a waiver of the right to appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's R&R and agrees that the petition should be dismissed as time-barred. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's R&R (Doc. # 7) and DISMISSES the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. # 1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

Dan Aaron Polster

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pinkston v. Kelly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 9, 2014
CASE NO. 1:13CV2220 (N.D. Ohio May. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Pinkston v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:IKE PINKSTON Petitioner, v. BENNIE KELLY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 9, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 1:13CV2220 (N.D. Ohio May. 9, 2014)