From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinkney v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 27, 2003
302 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

91866

Decided and Entered: February 27, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Bruce R. Bryan, Syracuse, for petitioner.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized use of controlled substances after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. At his disciplinary hearing, petitioner pleaded guilty to the charged misconduct, asserting in mitigation his status as a recovering drug addict. By virtue of his knowing and voluntary guilty plea, petitioner is now precluded from challenging the determination of his guilt on the ground of insufficient evidence (see Matter of Grant v. Goord, 247 A.D.2d 662, 663). Were we to consider this issue, however, we would find that substantial evidence supports the determination in the form of the misbehavior report, the positive urinalysis test results and petitioner's admission of guilt (see Matter of Garcia v. Goord, 272 A.D.2d 693, 694). The remaining issues raised by petitioner have been examined and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Pinkney v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 27, 2003
302 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Pinkney v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARVIN PINKNEY, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 27, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 599

Citing Cases

Simpson v. Annucci

We confirm. Petitioner is precluded from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence upon which the…

Montcrieft v. Goord

provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Thomas v. Goord, 293…