Summary
refusing to consider argument that "at least some of the jobs that roughly correspond to those identified by the [VE] are described in the DOT as exceeding her exertional level" because plaintiff did not question VE during hearing
Summary of this case from Ruffin v. ColvinOpinion
No. 07-51211 Summary Calendar.
August 11, 2008.
Mary Ellen Felps, Austin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
James F. Gilligan, Jr., U.S. Attorney's Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 5:06-CV-844.
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.