From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pilson v. Canavan

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Jan 19, 2022
No. CIV-21-961-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 19, 2022)

Opinion

CIV-21-961-C

01-19-2022

DONALD PILSON, Petitioner, v. JUDGE CANAVAN, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Robin J. Cauthron United States District Judge

This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Erwin entered a Report and Recommendation on December 7, 2021, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo.

Petitioner does not dispute the facts or the law set out in the Report and Recommendation, but merely restates why he believes he is entitled to relief. But the relief he seeks is not available, for the reasons clearly and accurately stated by Judge Erwin.

Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, the petition for habeas corpus is dismissed. A judgment will enter accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Pilson v. Canavan

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Jan 19, 2022
No. CIV-21-961-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Pilson v. Canavan

Case Details

Full title:DONALD PILSON, Petitioner, v. JUDGE CANAVAN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 19, 2022

Citations

No. CIV-21-961-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 19, 2022)