From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pilla v. La Flor De Mayo Express, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 1993
191 A.D.2d 224 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 9, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.).


The requirements of CPLR 305 (b) were complied with in the instant case. While the words "personal injury" may not apprise the defendants of the precise legal theory behind plaintiff's case, they adequately apprise defendants of the "nature of the action" at this stage of the litigation (cf., Drummer v. Valeron Corp., 154 A.D.2d 897, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 705).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Pilla v. La Flor De Mayo Express, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 1993
191 A.D.2d 224 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Pilla v. La Flor De Mayo Express, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD E. PILLA, Respondent, v. LA FLOR DE MAYO EXPRESS, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 224 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 678

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Greenpoint Mortg. Funding, Inc.

Moreover, the notice that accompanies a summons when no complaint is filed at the commencement of an action…

Stevens & Co. v. Espat

N.Y. C.P.L.R. 305(b); see Parker v. Mack, 460 N.E.2d 1316, 1317 (N.Y. 1984)) (the summons need only provide…