From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pike v. Pearce

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 13, 1992
600 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-1871.

June 12, 1992. Rehearing Denied July 13, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Seminole County, C. Vernon Mize, Jr., J.

Brian D. Stokes, Bogin, Munns Munns, Orlando, for appellant.

W.R. Armstrong, Daytona Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a personal injury case. We reverse.

Briefly the facts are that appellant was a personal caretaker for an elderly woman who became violent and assaulted appellant and caused injury. Appellee defended the lawsuit filed by appellant, saying that by accepting checks which appellee had designated as payments under the worker's compensation law that appellant had foregone any right to seek tort damages. Appellant denies accepting the checks as worker's compensation benefits and says she is legally entitled to seek money damages.

There are material factual disputes in this tort case. Summary judgment is inappropriate. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pike v. Pearce

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 13, 1992
600 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Pike v. Pearce

Case Details

Full title:STELLA MARIE PIKE, APPELLANT, v. RICHARD W. PEARCE, AS GUARDIAN OF THE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 13, 1992

Citations

600 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)