Summary
finding that extra work duty did not amount to an atypical and significant hardship
Summary of this case from Bailey v. IngramOpinion
Civil No. 07-2003 (JNE/JJG).
August 6, 2008
ORDER
In a Report and Recommendation dated July 8, 2008, the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Defendants' motion to dismiss be granted, that Plaintiff's ex parte request for release be denied, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff objected, and Defendants responded. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' motion to dismiss [Docket No. 35] is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff's ex parte request for release [Docket No. 26] is DENIED.
3. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.