From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pigeon v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 17, 2016
No. 70650 (Nev. Nov. 17, 2016)

Opinion

No. 70650

11-17-2016

CHRISTOPHER E. PIGEON, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

cc: Christopher E. Pigeon Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenging the validity of a judgment of conviction. Without deciding the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. Petitioner has an adequate legal remedy by way of a direct appeal, which is currently pending in this court, or a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. See NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Parraguirre /s/_________, J.
Hardesty /s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Christopher E. Pigeon

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Pigeon v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 17, 2016
No. 70650 (Nev. Nov. 17, 2016)
Case details for

Pigeon v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER E. PIGEON, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 17, 2016

Citations

No. 70650 (Nev. Nov. 17, 2016)