From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierson v. Shelton

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Sep 6, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07-CV-451-WKW (WO) (M.D. Ala. Sep. 6, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:07-CV-451-WKW (WO).

September 6, 2007


ORDER


On August 15, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 10) that the defendant's motion for summary judgment (originally filed as a special report) (Doc. # 8) is due to be granted and this action dismissed without prejudice because the plaintiff has failed to exhaust administrative remedies. No objections were filed.

After an independent and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court that:

1. The Recommendation (Doc. # 10) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.

2. The defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 8) is GRANTED to the extent defendants seek dismissal for failure to exhaust an available administrative remedy.

3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to exhaust available administrative remedies.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.


Summaries of

Pierson v. Shelton

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Sep 6, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07-CV-451-WKW (WO) (M.D. Ala. Sep. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Pierson v. Shelton

Case Details

Full title:CYRUS DESMOND PIERSON Plaintiff, v. JEFF SHELTON, of the COFFEE COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 6, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 1:07-CV-451-WKW (WO) (M.D. Ala. Sep. 6, 2007)

Citing Cases

McLendon v. Teodoro

Indeed, “the PLRA's exhaustion requirement contains no futility exception where there is an available inmate…

Kitchens v. Nixon

Additionally, to the extent Plaintiff alleges that appealing his conviction for fighting would be futile, as…