From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierson v. John C. Heath Attorney at Law, PLLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 23, 2015
1:15-CV-00149-SMS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)

Opinion


EBONY PIERSON AND CRUZ RAMIREZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN C. HEATH ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC, d.b.a. LEXINGTON LAW FIRM, Defendant. No. 1:15-CV-00149-SMS United States District Court, E.D. California. March 23, 2015

          ORDER

          SANDRA M. SNYDER, Magistrate Judge.

         Having reviewed the parties' Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint, the Court finds that there is good cause to grant the stipulation. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. Defendant's time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint shall be extended up to and including April 21, 2015.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pierson v. John C. Heath Attorney at Law, PLLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 23, 2015
1:15-CV-00149-SMS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Pierson v. John C. Heath Attorney at Law, PLLC

Case Details

Full title:EBONY PIERSON AND CRUZ RAMIREZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 23, 2015

Citations

1:15-CV-00149-SMS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)