From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 4, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-126 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-126

03-04-2013

Kathleen Pierson, Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed February 1, 2013 (Doc. 18).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

______________________

Sandra S. Beckwith, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Pierson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 4, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-126 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Pierson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Kathleen Pierson, Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-126 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2013)

Citing Cases

Spataro v. Kijakazi

, at *7 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 1, 2013), report and recommendationadopted, No. 1:12-CV-126, 2013 WL 791875 (S.D.…

Ross v. Berryhill

Accordingly, Plaintiff cannot obtain relief on this ground. See Pierson v. Commissioner of Soc. Sec., No.…