From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierre v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 5, 2016
Case No. CV 15-02944-DTB (C.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2016)

Summary

finding no conflict where VE testified that a person with the claimant's limitations, requiring the use of a cane for ambulation, could perform the identified job, which required constant reaching, handling, and fingering

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Saul

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-02944-DTB

02-05-2016

RAMONA MARIE PIERRE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order Affirming Decision of Commissioner filed herewith,

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed and this action is dismissed with prejudice. DATED: February 5, 2016

/s/_________

DAVID T. BRISTOW

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Pierre v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 5, 2016
Case No. CV 15-02944-DTB (C.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2016)

finding no conflict where VE testified that a person with the claimant's limitations, requiring the use of a cane for ambulation, could perform the identified job, which required constant reaching, handling, and fingering

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Saul

finding no conflict between DOT and VE testimony where DOT did "not contain a requirement of bilateral reaching, handling, and fingering" for the position

Summary of this case from Gonya v. Colvin

finding no conflict where VE testified that a person with claimant's limitations, requiring the use of a cane for ambulation, could perform the identified job, which required constant reaching, handling, and fingering

Summary of this case from Trujillo v. Colvin
Case details for

Pierre v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:RAMONA MARIE PIERRE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 5, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 15-02944-DTB (C.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2016)

Citing Cases

Trujillo v. Colvin

The Court finds that there is no conflict between the DOT job description for the ticket taker job and the…

Johnson v. Saul

The DOT does not expressly require bilateral reaching, handling, and fingering for the sedentary jobs of…