From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Warden, Ross Cnty. Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 5, 2013
Case No. C-3:10-cv-132 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. C-3:10-cv-132

03-05-2013

JAMES PIERCE Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Ross County Correctional Institution Respondent.


Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington


ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING PIERCE'S OBJECTIONS (Doc.

#17) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATIONS; OVERRULING THE WARDEN'S OBJECTIONS

(Doc. #16) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. #14) DENYING PIERCE'S

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; DENYING PIERCE

LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DENYING PIERCE A

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND TERMINATING THIS CASE

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to pro se Petitioner James Pierce's ("Pierce's") Objections (doc. #17) to Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington's Report and Recommendations (doc. #14) and the Warden's Objections (doc. #16) to Chief Magistrate Judge Ovington's Report and Recommendations (doc. #14). Upon review, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Pierce's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied, that Pierce be denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis and that Pierce be denied a certificate of appealability.

Both Pierce and the Warden objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations. The time has run and neither Pierce nor the Warden have responded to the other's Objections. Therefore, Pierce's Objections and the Warden's Objections are both ripe for decision.

As required by 28 U.S.C. §636(b) and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 72(b), the District Judge has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that Pierce's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations and the Warden's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations are not well-taken, and they are hereby OVERRULED. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations is adopted with one exception. The "January 2, 2003" date on page 19 of the Report and Recommendations should be "January 2, 2007."

Pierce's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. Further, Pierce is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis and a certificate of appealability. Finally, the captioned cause is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this 5th day of March, 2013.

_______________

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record
James Pierce at his last address of record


Summaries of

Pierce v. Warden, Ross Cnty. Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 5, 2013
Case No. C-3:10-cv-132 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Pierce v. Warden, Ross Cnty. Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES PIERCE Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Ross County Correctional Institution…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Mar 5, 2013

Citations

Case No. C-3:10-cv-132 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2013)