From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Obama

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 29, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-0502 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:16-cv-0502 JAM CKD P

04-29-2016

SEAVON PIERCE, Plaintiff, v. BARACK OBAMA, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On April 4, 2016, plaintiff, a Three Strikes litigant, was ordered to pay the filing fee within fourteen days or face dismissal of this action. (ECF No. 7.) That period has now expired, and plaintiff has filed objections to the order denying in forma pauperis status, but not paid the filing fee. Plaintiff's objections are without merit.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified //// time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: April 29, 2016

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 / pier0502.1915(g)


Summaries of

Pierce v. Obama

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 29, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-0502 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Pierce v. Obama

Case Details

Full title:SEAVON PIERCE, Plaintiff, v. BARACK OBAMA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 29, 2016

Citations

No. 2:16-cv-0502 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2016)