From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1917
181 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Opinion

November, 1917.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The cause of action arose in New York county. The witnesses, all except the son of the defendant, live in New York. Two of the witnesses are members of the police force in New York, who should not unnecessarily be called away from the city. Justice is as apt to be obtained in New York county as in Westchester; and, therefore, we think that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice will be promoted by changing the place of trial to New York county. Jenks, P.J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Pierce v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1917
181 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)
Case details for

Pierce v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:MARY PIERCE, Respondent, v. CHARLES MOORE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1917

Citations

181 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Citing Cases

Turner v. Constantine

As, however, his office is in New York city, a trial there will not inconvenience him, or his witness, Eden,…

Conner v. Jacobs

Each alleges that he was proceeding on Sycamore Street, a through street, and that the other entered the…