From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Humboldt Cty. Sup. Ct.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 17, 2024
23-cv-04018 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-04018 BLF (PR)

01-17-2024

NATHANIEL D. PIERCE, Petitioner, v. HUMBOLDT CTY. SUP. CT., et al., Respondents.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Dkt. No. 1, and then a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Dkt. No. 7. On December 5, 2023, the Court dismissed the petition with leave to amend using the court's form petition and to address the issue of exhaustion. Dkt. No. 15. Petitioner was advised that failure to timely respond in accordance with the order would result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice. Id. at 4.

The deadline, January 2, 2024, has passed, and Petitioner has failed to respond in the time provided. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pierce v. Humboldt Cty. Sup. Ct.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 17, 2024
23-cv-04018 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Pierce v. Humboldt Cty. Sup. Ct.

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL D. PIERCE, Petitioner, v. HUMBOLDT CTY. SUP. CT., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 17, 2024

Citations

23-cv-04018 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2024)