From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Humboldt Cty. Sup. Ct

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 30, 2023
23-cv-04018 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-04018 BLF (PR)

11-30-2023

NATHANIEL D. PIERCE, Plaintiff, v. HUMBOLDT CTY. SUP. CT., et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CHANGE CASE DESIGNATION

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On August 9, 2023, Plaintiff filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the Superior Court of Humboldt County, Humboldt County Correctional Facility, and officers at the Sheriff's Office. Dkt. No. 1. However, the complaint includes challenges to his current confinement, including a false warrant, and seeks release without probation. Id. at 3. Then on September 1, 2023, Petitioner filed a habeas petition in this same action, challenging the revocation of probation. Dkt. No. 7.

Although the initiating papers caused the nature of suit to be designated as “550 Prisoner: Civil Rights,” it appears that Plaintiff's intent was to file a habeas action, as evidenced by his subsequent filing. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to change the case designation to “530: Habeas Corpus.”

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pierce v. Humboldt Cty. Sup. Ct

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 30, 2023
23-cv-04018 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Pierce v. Humboldt Cty. Sup. Ct

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL D. PIERCE, Plaintiff, v. HUMBOLDT CTY. SUP. CT., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Nov 30, 2023

Citations

23-cv-04018 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2023)