From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. E. Bay Mun. Util. Dist.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 2, 2023
21-cv-04325-AGT (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2023)

Opinion

21-cv-04325-AGT

05-02-2023

SAJI PIERCE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE

RE: DKT. NO. 140

Alex G. Tse, United States Magistrate Judge

Firm trial dates in federal cases are critical to case management.

In December 2022, the Court granted the parties' request for a two-month continuance of the trial in this matter. See Dkt. 89. In the continuance request, plaintiffs' counsel didn't mention any conflict between the newly proposed trial dates (dates that plaintiffs' counsel agreed to) and the trial schedule in Tam v. San Francisco Federal Credit Union, San Francisco County Superior Court No. CGC-20-585899. A conflict between the trial schedules in Tam and this case has now arisen, see dkt. 140, but the Court is unwilling to reschedule trial again. Plaintiffs' request for a status conference to discuss another possible move of the trial is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pierce v. E. Bay Mun. Util. Dist.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 2, 2023
21-cv-04325-AGT (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Pierce v. E. Bay Mun. Util. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:SAJI PIERCE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 2, 2023

Citations

21-cv-04325-AGT (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2023)