From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. City of Mullins Police

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 2, 2010
368 F. App'x 360 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-2213.

Submitted: February 25, 2010.

Decided: March 2, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:00-cv-04004-TLW).

Henry Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Vinton D. Lide, Lide Pauley, LLC, Lexington, South Carolina; Katherine Anne Phillips, Lake E. Summers, Malone, Thompson, Summers Ott, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Henry Pierce appeals the district court's order denying as untimely his motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6), in which he sought a new trial on his excessive force claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pierce v. City of Mullins Police Dep't, No. 4:00-cv-04004-TLW (D.S.C. Oct. 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Pierce v. City of Mullins Police

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 2, 2010
368 F. App'x 360 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Pierce v. City of Mullins Police

Case Details

Full title:Henry PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MULLINS POLICE DEPARTMENT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 2, 2010

Citations

368 F. App'x 360 (4th Cir. 2010)