From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Baker

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jun 14, 2007
8:06CV259 (D. Neb. Jun. 14, 2007)

Opinion

8:06CV259.

June 14, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on defendant Patton's motion for judgment on the pleadings brought in his official and individual capacities pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 12(c), 12(b)(6), and 12(h)(2) (Filing No. 36). In addition, Patton has filed a brief and an affidavit in support of his motion (Filing Nos. 37 and 38).

According to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 12(c), a party may present matters outside the pleadings for the Court to consider. If the Court elects to consider such matters, the Court must treat the motion as one for summary judgment and dispose of it as provided in Rule 56. Further, "all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material pertinent to such a motion by Rule 56." Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c).

Since Patton has presented an affidavit and supporting brief containing matters outside the pleadings, the Court elects to treat the motion as one for summary judgment. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Pierce shall have until July 6, 2007, to submit evidence and an opposing brief in response to said motion.


Summaries of

Pierce v. Baker

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jun 14, 2007
8:06CV259 (D. Neb. Jun. 14, 2007)
Case details for

Pierce v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM C. PIERCE, Plaintiff, v. NATALIE BAKER, M.D., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Jun 14, 2007

Citations

8:06CV259 (D. Neb. Jun. 14, 2007)