From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pier I Imports, Inc. v. Pitcher

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jan 30, 1973
272 So. 2d 696 (La. 1973)

Opinion

No. 53147.

January 30, 1973.

IN RE: PIER I IMPORTS, INC., PAUL GERSTENBERGER AND HOLLY TATSCH APPLYING FOR CERTIORARI, OR WRIT OF REVIEW, TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE.


Writ denied. There is no merit in the complaint.

BARHAM, J., dissents from the writ refusal and assigns reasons.


I believe that this writ should have been granted to consider the complaint of the relators that the district attorney for the Parish of East Baton Rouge has violated relators' constitutional right to equal protection of the laws. Relators have been prosecuted three times for violating the Sunday Closing Law, R.S. 51:194. This suit was instituted to enjoin the district attorney from similar action in the future. A stipulation was offered at the trial to show hundreds of violations of this law every Sunday in the City of Baton Rouge which are known to the district attorney. The district attorney, however, admitted that the only prosecutions pursued by him under this law are those instigated by citizen complaints, and that the three prosecutions against relators were the only ones he had ever undertaken. This practice permits some, like relators in this case, to be prosecuted for activities in which others engage with impunity. The delegation of the prosecutorial function in this manner denies equal protection and due process to these relators. The Fourteenth and Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution are violated by these procedures. I respectfully dissent from the refusal to grant the writ.


Summaries of

Pier I Imports, Inc. v. Pitcher

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jan 30, 1973
272 So. 2d 696 (La. 1973)
Case details for

Pier I Imports, Inc. v. Pitcher

Case Details

Full title:PIER I IMPORTS, INC. v. SARGENT PITCHER, JR

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jan 30, 1973

Citations

272 So. 2d 696 (La. 1973)