holding that preemption under 12 C.F.R. § 563.39 of a state employment contract claim constitutes an affirmative defense and does not involve a choice-of-forum question
Summary of this case from Pena v. Downey Sav. and Loan Ass'nNo. 92-244.
October 5, 1992, October TERM, 1992.
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 956 F. 2d 1484.
holding that preemption under 12 C.F.R. § 563.39 of a state employment contract claim constitutes an affirmative defense and does not involve a choice-of-forum question
Summary of this case from Pena v. Downey Sav. and Loan Ass'nendorsing the proposition that a default judgment "constituted a final judgment with res judicata effect"
Summary of this case from States Resources Corp. v. CapizziFull title:PIEKARSKI v. HOME OWNERS SAVING BANK, F. S. B., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 5, 1992
Id. at 164-65, 103 S.Ct. at 2290-91 (internal citations omitted). See also Ooley v. Schwitzer Div., Household…
Sperling v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.onal discrimination. See also EEOC v. Chicago Miniature Lamp Works, 947 F.2d 292, 297 (7th Cir. 1991)…