From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickett v. GM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 4, 2020
20 CIVIL 75 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2020)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 75 (ER)

03-04-2020

JUANITA PICKETT, Plaintiff, v. GM and MOTOR LIQUIDATION CO., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 4, 2020, Pickett's case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Pickett's complaint, filed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

March 4, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Pickett v. GM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 4, 2020
20 CIVIL 75 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2020)
Case details for

Pickett v. GM

Case Details

Full title:JUANITA PICKETT, Plaintiff, v. GM and MOTOR LIQUIDATION CO., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 4, 2020

Citations

20 CIVIL 75 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2020)