From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickett v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 31, 2024
No. 6086-22 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 31, 2024)

Opinion

6086-22

01-31-2024

KENNETH MARK PICKETT & MARY FRANCES PICKETT, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge.

On January 29, 2024, the parties filed a Proposed Stipulated Decision. However, the proposed decision document does not contain proper signature blocks below petitioners' signatures. Rule 23(a)(4) of the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure directs that a proposed decision document must omit a party's mailing address, email address, and telephone number. Here, the Court notes that petitioners have included this information. That being so, it is

ORDERED that the parties' Proposed Stipulated Decision is deemed stricken from the Court's record in this case. It is further

ORDERED that, on or before February 21, 2024, the parties shall file a revised Proposed Stipulated Decision.


Summaries of

Pickett v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 31, 2024
No. 6086-22 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Pickett v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH MARK PICKETT & MARY FRANCES PICKETT, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 31, 2024

Citations

No. 6086-22 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 31, 2024)