Pickett v. Aramark

Full title: JOHN PICKETT, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

Date published: Jun 27, 2008

CASE NO. 5:08cv111/RS/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jun. 27, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:08cv111/RS/EMT.

June 27, 2008

ORDER

RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge

Before me are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) and Plaintiff's Response to Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9). I have considered Plaintiff's objections de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed because of failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. This case is dismissed without prejudice.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED.