From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickerell v. Wholesale Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1917
91 S.E. 353 (N.C. 1917)

Opinion

(Filed 21 February, 1917.)

CIVIL ACTION, tried before Allen, J., at November Term, 1916, of WILSON.

F. J. Swindell for plaintiff.

F. S. Hassell for defendant.


Defendant appealed.


This case was before us at a former term, 169 N.C. 381. At the last trial, when the judgment from which this appeal is taken was rendered, the court seems to have followed the principles stated in the first appeal, and we see no substantial error in the case. The exceptions are taken mostly to questions of evidence, but neither party appears to have been really prejudiced by that which was admitted, or by any of the rulings. Young v. Mfg. Co., 151 N.C. 272. A fair opportunity was given to present the case on both sides, and we must decline to disturb the judgment.

No error.


Summaries of

Pickerell v. Wholesale Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1917
91 S.E. 353 (N.C. 1917)
Case details for

Pickerell v. Wholesale Co.

Case Details

Full title:PICKERELL CRAIG COMPANY v. WHOLESALE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1917

Citations

91 S.E. 353 (N.C. 1917)
173 N.C. 698

Citing Cases

Young v. Manufacturing Co.

Affirmed. Cited: Pickerell v. Wholesale Co., 173 N.C. 698.…