From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piccinino v. General Motors Corporation

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District. Division One
May 25, 2004
136 S.W.3d 129 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. ED 83565

May 25, 2004

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.

Daniel J. Harlan, Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Barbara L. Toepke, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Charles, MO, Caroline Bean, Asst. Atty. Gen., Attorney for General Motors Corp., St. Louis, MO, Attorney for Missouri State Treasurer, for Appellant.

Harry J. Nichols, Stephen G. Kaludis, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary R. Russell, JJ.



ORDER


General Motors Corporation (Employer) and the Second Injury Fund (Fund) appeal the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission), which modified the award of the administrative law judge (ALJ), awarding Carlo Piccinino (Claimant) disability benefits.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. We find the Commission's award is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Section 287.495, RSMo 2000. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Piccinino v. General Motors Corporation

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District. Division One
May 25, 2004
136 S.W.3d 129 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Piccinino v. General Motors Corporation

Case Details

Full title:CARLO PICCININO, Respondent/Employee, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District. Division One

Date published: May 25, 2004

Citations

136 S.W.3d 129 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)