From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Picart v. Pollard

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 5, 2022
CV 21-3367-DSF (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2022)

Opinion

CV 21-3367-DSF (AGR)

12-05-2022

STEPHEN MARK PICART, Petitioner, v. MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DALE S. FISCHER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“FAP”), the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED as follows:

(1) Respondent's motion to dismiss the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is granted as untimely;

(2) Petitioner's request to amend the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and

(3) Judgment be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Picart v. Pollard

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 5, 2022
CV 21-3367-DSF (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Picart v. Pollard

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN MARK PICART, Petitioner, v. MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 5, 2022

Citations

CV 21-3367-DSF (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2022)