From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PIATT v. WARDEN, SOCF

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 13, 2009
Case Number: 1:08cv415 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 13, 2009)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:08cv415.

March 13, 2009


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Black filed on February 12, 2009 (Doc. 32), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired March 4, 2009, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that plaintiff's motion that the District Court contact the defendants (Doc. 12) and motions to admit documents (Docs. 11, 18) (collectively construed as a motion for summary judgment) are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

PIATT v. WARDEN, SOCF

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 13, 2009
Case Number: 1:08cv415 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 13, 2009)
Case details for

PIATT v. WARDEN, SOCF

Case Details

Full title:BILLY JACK PIATT, Plaintiff(s), v. WARDEN, SOCF, et. al., Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 13, 2009

Citations

Case Number: 1:08cv415 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 13, 2009)

Citing Cases

Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon

; Piatt v. Warden, SOCF, No. 1:08cv415, 2009 WL 700706, at *3 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 13, 2009) (“If a…