From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piasecki v. Rashib

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 1994
203 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 18, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well established that "a person of unsound mind but not judicially declared incompetent may sue or be sued in the same manner as any ordinary member of the community" (Sengstack v Sengstack, 4 N.Y.2d 502; Keown v Wright, 89 A.D.2d 932; Rau v Tannenbaum, 85 A.D.2d 522; Anonymous v Anonymous, 3 A.D.2d 590; Weldon v Long Is. Coll. Hosp., 142 Misc.2d 61, 64-65). The plaintiff at bar became comatose on September 11, 1988, but was not declared incompetent until March 6, 1989, some three months after she commenced her lawsuit. We do not find that the temporary appointment of a guardian ad litem for the limited purpose of representing the plaintiff in a conservatorship proceeding held on November 23, 1988, constituted a judicial declaration of incompetence, or interfered with the plaintiff's right to commence suit in her own name. Mangano, P.J., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Piasecki v. Rashib

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 1994
203 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Piasecki v. Rashib

Case Details

Full title:HELEN PIASECKI, Respondent, v. HUMAYUN RASHIB, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 18, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 874

Citing Cases

Piggott v. Lifespire, Inc.

The Supreme Court granted the motions. An individual who is of unsound mind, but who has not been judicially…

In re Mones

We disagree. A person of unsound mind but not judicially declared incompetent may sue or be sued in the same…