From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piao v. Jaddou

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 25, 2022
CV 22-6480-PA-MAR (C.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-6480-PA-MAR

11-25-2022

XIANNU PIAO, Plaintiff, v. UR M. JADDOU, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Honorable Percy Anderson, United States District Judge.

Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss the Case submitted by the parties, and finding good cause therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The instant action shall be dismissed without prejudice;

2. USCIS agrees to interview Plaintiff on May 11, 2023 at 9:45 a.m.;

3. Defendants agree to diligently work towards adjudication of Plaintiffs' I-589 Application for Asylum and Withholding of Removal within 120 days of the completion of Plaintiff's interview, absent unforeseen or exceptional circumstances that would require additional time to complete adjudication;

4. In the event that adjudication is not completed within 120 days of the completion of the interview, Plaintiff may refile this action;

5. Plaintiff agrees to submit all supplemental documents and evidence, if any, to USCIS seven (7) to ten (10) days prior to the agreed upon scheduled interview. Plaintiff recognizes that failure to submit these documents seven (7) to ten (10) days prior to the interview may result in the interview being rescheduled at no fault of USCIS; and

6. Each party shall bear his, her or its own litigation costs and attorney fees.


Summaries of

Piao v. Jaddou

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 25, 2022
CV 22-6480-PA-MAR (C.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Piao v. Jaddou

Case Details

Full title:XIANNU PIAO, Plaintiff, v. UR M. JADDOU, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 25, 2022

Citations

CV 22-6480-PA-MAR (C.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 2022)