From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piacentini v. Mineola Union Free Sch. Dist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 13, 1999
267 A.D.2d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted November 10, 1999

December 13, 1999

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff, Roger Piacentini, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated December 17, 1998, which denied his motion to vacate an order of the same court, dated October 21, 1997, dismissing the complaint on the ground that he had failed to appear for a preliminary conference.

Deutsch Sneider, Glendale, N.Y. (Eric G. Slepian of counsel), for appellant.

Steven L. Sidney, Woodbury, N.Y. (Charles R. Strugatz of counsel), for respondent.

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., DAVID S. RITTER, DANIEL W. JOY, LEO F. McGINITY and NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To vacate the order dismissing the complaint, the appellant had to proffer a reasonable excuse for the default and establish the existence of a meritorious cause of action (see, CPLR 5015[a][1]; Alliance Prop. Mgt. Dev. v. Andrews Ave. Equities, 70 N.Y.2d 831 ;McNeil v. Milstein, 240 A.D.2d 549 ; Martinez v. Otis El. Co., 213 A.D.2d 523 ). The court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to vacate the default (see, Alliance Prop. Mgt. Dev. v. Andrews Ave. Equities, supra; Barasch v. Micucci, 49 N.Y.2d 594 ). The record reveals an overall lack of diligence by the appellant in prosecuting his claim, a pattern of willful default, and neglect. No reasonable excuse was offered either for his failure to appear at the preliminary conference or for the lengthy delay in bringing the motion to vacate his default (see, Yepez v. Damico, 239 A.D.2d 412 ; Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, 238 A.D.2d 568 ; Martinez v. Otis El. Co., supra; Gannon v. Johnson Scale Co., 189 A.D.2d 1052 ). Furthermore, the appellant failed to proffer sufficient evidence of the merit of his underlying claim.

MANGANO, P.J., RITTER, JOY, McGINITY, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Piacentini v. Mineola Union Free Sch. Dist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 13, 1999
267 A.D.2d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Piacentini v. Mineola Union Free Sch. Dist

Case Details

Full title:ROGER PIACENTINI, appellant, v. MINEOLA UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
700 N.Y.S.2d 205

Citing Cases

Titan Realty Corporation v. Schlem

ORDERED that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs. A party seeking to vacate a default judgment must…

Parker v. City of New York

It is well settled that a plaintiff seeking to vacate a default must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse…